Today’s objectives
- Take stock: Russia’s status as “energy superpower”
- Consider: how gas can be used as a geopolitical instrument
- Discuss: lessons from Russia’s coercive gas diplomacy
Overview
Russia is world’s 3rd largest energy producer and consumer
(data from DOE’s Energy Information Administration, 2021)
Total Energy Production
1 |
China |
135.0 |
2 |
United States |
98.3 |
3 |
Russia |
64.1 |
4 |
Saudi Arabia |
26.6 |
5 |
Canada |
23.4 |
Total Energy Consumption
1 |
China |
165.2 |
2 |
United States |
97.9 |
3 |
Russia |
34.2 |
4 |
India |
32.0 |
5 |
Japan |
18.1 |
Oil
(2021 data)
- Reserves
- 8th largest reserves
(80 billion barrels)
- Production
- 2nd largest producer
(12 million barrels/day)
- Consumption
- 4th largest consumer
(3.7 million barrels/day)
- Exports
- 2nd largest exporter
(5.2 million barrels/day)
- 82% tanker, 18% pipeline
- 2022:
- 42% to EU
- 36% to China
- 12% to India
Petroleum production
1 |
United States |
20,301 |
2 |
Saudi Arabia |
12,144 |
3 |
Russia |
10,938 |
4 |
Canada |
5,694 |
5 |
China |
5,119 |
Crude oil exports
2 |
Saudi Arabia |
7,341 |
1 |
Russia |
5,196 |
4 |
Iraq |
3,976 |
1 |
Canada |
3,177 |
5 |
UAE |
2,427 |
Natural gas
(2021 data)
- Reserves
- world’s largest reserves
(1,688 trillion cubic feet)
- Production
- 2nd largest producer
(25 Tcf/year)
- 71% consumed domestically
- Consumption
- 2nd largest consumer
(15.8 Tcf/year)
- Exports
- world’s largest exporter
(8.9 Tcf/year)
- 85% pipeline, 15% LNG
- 2021: 61% to EU (5.4 Tcf)
2022: 16% to EU (1.4 Tcf)
Natural gas production
1 |
United States |
34.5 |
2 |
Russia |
24.8 |
3 |
Iran |
8.8 |
4 |
China |
7.5 |
5 |
Canada |
6.4 |
Natural gas exports
1 |
Russia |
8.9 |
2 |
United States |
6.7 |
3 |
Qatar |
4.4 |
4 |
Norway |
3.9 |
5 |
Australia |
3.7 |
Natural Gas as Foreign Policy Instrument
Russia’s major natural gas export pipelines (2021 data)
Yamal-Europe |
1.2 Tcf |
2,552 mi |
W Siberia |
Poland, |
Belarus |
|
|
|
|
Germany, |
|
|
|
|
|
N Europe |
|
Blue Stream |
0.6 Tcf |
754 mi |
W Siberia |
Turkey |
Black Sea |
Nord Stream |
1.9 Tcf |
761 mi |
W Siberia |
Germany, |
Baltic Sea |
|
|
|
|
N Europe |
|
Nord Stream 2 |
1.9 Tcf |
761 mi |
W Siberia |
Germany, |
Baltic Sea |
|
|
|
|
N Europe |
|
Soyuz, Brotherhood |
1.1 Tcf |
2,800 mi |
W Siberia, |
Europe |
Ukraine |
|
|
|
C Asia |
|
|
TurkStream |
1.1 Tcf |
580 mi |
W Siberia |
Turkey, |
Black Sea |
|
|
|
|
SE Europe |
|
Europe total |
7.8 Tcf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sakh.-Khab.-Vlad. |
0.2 Tcf |
1,118 mi |
Sakhalin |
NE China, |
|
|
|
|
|
Vladivostok LNG |
|
Power of Siberia |
2.2 Tcf |
5,040 mi |
E Siberia |
NE China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia total |
2.4 Tcf |
|
|
|
|
Gas and Geopolitics
How Russian gas is different from oil
- Infrastructure
- only ways to transport gas are pipelines & liquefied natural gas
- both very expensive to build (investments tied to long-term, state-sanctioned contracts)
- storage facilities also costly
(vulnerable to disruptions)
- Markets
- can’t buy gas on spot markets
(harder to diversify sources)
- no global “market price” for gas
(seller can dictate price)
- gas can be sold direct to customer
(Gazprom \(=\) local energy utility)
- Ownership
- no private gas production, sales (Gazprom is state monopoly)
How did Europe get hooked on Russian gas?
- Diversification from Middle East
- 1973 oil crisis price shocks
- USSR seen as potentially more reliable supplier
- assumption: USSR to be “one of several” alternatives
- Search for alternative fuel sources
- reduce reliance on coal & oil
(natural gas is relatively clean-burning fossil fuel)
- phase out nuclear (Germany)
- Russian efforts vs. competition
- lobbying vs. S Caucasus pipeline (NABUCCO)
- efforts to destabilize alt transit routes (Georgia)
- price discounts
Exports to region, 2021
1 |
Europe |
7.36 |
2 |
Asia |
1.12 |
3 |
Rest of world |
0.38 |
Exports to country, 2021
1 |
Germany |
1.70 |
2 |
Turkey |
0.95 |
3 |
Italy |
0.92 |
4 |
Belarus |
0.70 |
5 |
France |
0.62 |
6 |
China |
0.56 |
7 |
Poland |
0.37 |
8 |
Japan |
0.32 |
9 |
United Kingdom |
0.17 |
10 |
South Korea |
0.14 |
How is Europe quitting Russia? (2022)
- Supply shocks
- oil:
- ban on seaborne oil imports
- global oil price cap (G7)
- gas:
- Nord Stream 2 suspended
- Nord Stream 1 disabled
- Switch to LNG
- 77% increase in LNG imports
(mostly from US, but also Russia)
- build new LNG terminals
- Conserve
- fill storage tanks (82 pct in 2023)
- reduce consumption
- Get lucky
- mild winter 2022-2023
Russia gas share of Europe’s energy:
40% (2021) \(\to\) 10% (2022)
Case Study: Ukraine 2006 Gas Crisis
Russia’s coercive gas diplomacy
- Set prices
- sell at “below-market rates”
- wait for low rates to become baseline for destination country’s economy, industry
- threaten to raise rates to extract policy concessions
- Collect/cancel debts
- ignore under/non-payments
- then offer to cancel debt in exchange for concessions (e.g. pipeline equity stake)
- Control local gas distribution
- contacts include shares of local, transit pipelines
- direct sales to customers
Background to 2006 crisis
- Pre-2005
- 80% of Russia’s NG exports transit through Ukraine
- existing agreement: Ukraine pays $50/tcm until 2009 (lower than Russian domestic customers)
- 2005
- Yushchenko elected president, sets course for EU/NATO
- Gazprom request price hike to $160-$230/tcm (almost 5-fold)
- Putin offers loan to help Kyiv pay
- Yushchenko rejects offer
- January 2006
- Gazprom cuts volume of gas
(new \(=\) old \(-\) Ukraine’s share)
- Ukraine withdraws same amount as before, cutting gas to Europe
The Deal
- Sketchy middleman to the rescue
- GazpromExport sells to Naftohaz Ukrainy through intermediary: RosUkrEnergo (RUE)
- RUE buys
- Russian gas at $230/tcm
- Turkmen gas at $60/tcm
- RUE sells to Ukraine at $95/tcm
- RUE becomes sole importer of Russian gas to Ukraine
- Who is RosUkrEnergo?
- Swiss-registered company
- co-owned by Dmytro Firtash
- Criticism
- numbers don’t add up
(need 80/20 Turkmen/Russia mix just to break even at this price)
- complete lack of transparency
Discussion:
- How did these corrupt deals help Russia geopolitically? What is the “theory of cause and effect”?
- How successful was Russia’s coercive gas diplomacy in achieving its intended political effects? (i.e. keeping countries in Russia’s orbit)
- Why didn’t Russia play similar game with countries in Western/Central Europe?
- Is this still a viable strategy as Russian exports pivot to China?
NEXT MEETING
Information, Hybrid and Cyber Warfare (Tu, Nov. 14)
- How has Russia leveraged new technologies of warfare?
- Can these new technologies prove decisive on the battlefield?